Ask anyone who actually hires in football what gets a candidate noticed, and you'll hear the same answer: not the CV, not the certificates — the work. A portfolio is the difference between telling a club you can analyse a match and showing them you already have. Yet most aspiring analysts get this wrong. They either don't have a portfolio at all, or they've scattered their best work across a Twitter thread, a Google Drive folder, and a half-finished personal site that no club will ever find — let alone trust. A strong portfolio isn't just a collection of projects. It's proof, packaged so a busy recruiter can verify it in seconds. This guide covers what to put in a football analyst portfolio, the mistakes that get you ignored, and how to make sure clubs actually see it.
A CV is a list of claims. Anyone can write “proficient in Wyscout” or “experienced in opposition analysis.” A club has no way to know whether it's true until they've wasted an interview finding out. A portfolio flips that: instead of claiming you can build an opposition report, you hand them one and let it speak. This matters more in football than almost any other field, because the industry is flooded with people holding the same qualifications. The certificate proves you learned something. The portfolio proves you can do the job. When two candidates have identical CVs, the one with demonstrable work wins — every time.
Quality over quantity. Three excellent pieces beat ten rushed ones.
The most common one is making it impossible to trust. A PDF on your hard drive, a link that's expired, work with no context — a recruiter won't chase any of it. The second is no focus: trying to show you can do everything, so you end up looking mediocre at all of it instead of strong at one thing. The third, and the quiet killer, is invisibility. The best portfolio in the world does nothing if no club ever finds it. Plenty of genuinely talented people stay invisible for years — at smaller clubs, earlier in their careers, or outside the established networks — not because their work isn't good, but because it's not somewhere clubs are actually looking.
This is the gap BonaFide Pro was built to close. Instead of hoping a club stumbles across your personal site, you build your portfolio on a platform clubs actually search — and every project you add can be independently verified, so your work carries proof, not just claims. Here's how it works: you upload your analysis projects with the context and tools used; our team reviews each one and marks the genuine ones as VERIFIED; and verified work appears on your profile in a searchable database that clubs filter by role, tools, experience and tier. The more verified projects you build, the higher your tier — EMERGING, ESTABLISHED, RECOGNISED, ELITE — giving clubs an instant signal of how deep your portfolio runs. It's always free for candidates. No subscription, no trial, no catch.
At minimum: an opposition report, a player or data analysis, and a tactical breakdown — three strong, well-documented pieces with the context and tools shown. Quality matters far more than quantity.
No. You can build excellent portfolio pieces using publicly available footage and free data like the StatsBomb open data library. Many analysts land their first role on the strength of self-directed work.
Most won't find a personal website or a social thread. The reliable way to be found is to put your work on a platform clubs actively search — ideally one where your projects are verified, so your work is trusted as well as seen.
A degree helps but isn't required. Demonstrated work is consistently what gets people hired — the industry agrees that the gap between being qualified and being hired is closed by proof of work and visibility.
Build a verified portfolio of your analysis work, get found by clubs that are hiring, and apply with proof instead of promises. Always free for candidates.
JOIN AS A CANDIDATE — FREE